Reeding Week Task

After reading the three articles about the exhibition of Guy Bourdin, I learned some thing and there are others that I thought were there.

The first one, the one posted in Somerset House, is aimed to all the potential viewers of the exhibition and its purpose is to promote it. The writing used in it seems to me that is not too much academic because the purpose of the article is to promote, that is why it is easy to understand.

The second one, the one in Time Out, is aimed to all the readers of the magazine and its purpose is to inform. The writing they have used is more academic than the one before because what they want is to inform the readers about the exhibition, and the ones that read the magazine have a bit of knowledge.

Finally the third one, the one that was in The Guardian, is aimed to all the readers that want to know about the work of the artist and its purpose is to give the readers all the information about the author in form of a critique. The writing used is the most academic one of the three articles because they are using a lot of quotes of other people about the artist work.


In conclusion, I think that depending on the audience it is aimed the text has its own characteristics. Is not the same one that is fore promote something, because it is only going to have good things on it, than one that is to inform about next exhibitions or activities, that can have some degree of critique, than one that is just a review about something, in which case all the article can be a critique.